Some implications of "digital" for scholarly writing and communication

Category: reading

The future of the book

Reading Time: 3 minutes
A young woman reading a book, an image that suggests that reading is good for you.
Girl sat reading, an 1893 charcoal drawing

Here was an intriguing subject for a webinar, with the challenging title, The Future of the Book: Timeless or Time-Challenged? What could be more central than considering the role of books, in the …

Annotation: the scholarly goldmine

Reading Time: 5 minutes
The first page of the Geneva Bible, 1560 edition – with annotations

The literature review is one of the core components of the scholarly lifecycle. To begin your research, you see what has been said and done. Life being short, you …

Goodreads: is it good for reading?

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Eight categories of fiction titles

It is a commonplace that the act of reading is a worthy use of your time. However nonsensical that idea might be (nobody expects to be praised for the number of journal articles they read), it’s …

Digital content is addling our brains

Reading Time: 3 minutes
An image of a laptop screen showing digital content
[Image MU]

John Burns-Murdoch, in the Financial Times, is the latest to make this claim (“Have humans passed peak brain power?”, FT, 14 March 2025). “Evidence is mounting that … the average person’s ability to reason and solve …

How to read non-fiction

Reading Time: 3 minutes
Jan Ekels, Interior with young man reading, 1784 (Manchester City Art Gallery)

Karin Wulf, a well-known history academic, who effectively straddles the divide between academic and popular writing, revealed her methodology for appraising an academic work in an interesting post, a …

Reading on screen is addling our brains

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Academic studies of reading appear to be influenced by romantic ideas about how we read print (Corot, Woman reading in the country, around 1868-70, Metropolitan Museum)

Where did this idea come from, and is it valid? It seems to me an …

Has digital publishing ruined our ability to read?

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Photo by Oladimeji Ajegbile on Unsplash

Two of the oldest myths about reading are:

  1. We would be better people if we read more (for example here, here and here – but I could find hundreds of examples)
  2. We have only
…

The Scholarly Workflow in the Digital Age

Reading Time: 4 minutes

I expected great things from this book, published in the Charleston Briefings series. Digital scholarship has been around for enough time to assess how things have changed since the era of print; Google Scholar has existed since 2004, which means over …

What makes a book or article significant?

Reading Time: 3 minutes
Cover of the paperback edition of Nudge (2021,”final” edition)

The traditional measure of academic significance, invented way back in the 1960s, is the citation index. If a paper is cited, then it has significance for other researchers. If we count the …

Is Reading Unnatural?

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Vincenzo Foppa, Young Cicero reading (Wallace Collection)

Behind this talk (by Jeffrey Johnson, author of several books on UX design) was one great idea: that reading is unnatural. What Johnson meant by this seeming paradox is simply: any infant (unless handicapped) …

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén