Some implications of "digital" for scholarly writing and communication

Category: Wikipedia Page 1 of 2

Will genAI replace Wikipedia?

Reading Time: 3 minutes
A print edition of the 11th edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nice to see they have an entry for “mum” – I always thought she deserved one.

Having started using genAI, I can’t resist comparing its coverage with Wikipedia – and the …

Lazy definitions in the digital era

Reading Time: 4 minutes
Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, 1966

One unexpected aspect of digital publishing is the increasing misuse of links. Instead of explaining something, writers are increasingly turning to hyperlinks, saying, in other words, that I don’t need to explain this term – …

The perfect encyclopedia entry

Reading Time: 5 minutes

During several years of creating, editing, publishing, and revising dictionaries and encyclopedias, I produced guidance for my team of editors on what constitutes the perfect reference article. Subsequently, as a user, I continue to consult reference resources as part of the …

Wikipedia should not link to primary research

Reading Time: 4 minutes
The reference hierarchy, from simple to advanced understanding

Wikipedia is where we go first to look something up: you use it when you know nothing about a subject. That’s why Google, until recently, always promoted a Wikipedia article to the top …

What are Wikipedia categories for?

Reading Time: 4 minutes
“Partial view of Wikipedia’s category system from 2007. Arrows point from category to sub-category.”

I’ve written before about Wikipedia categories, using the example of a brand of toothpaste, and this post is an attempt to understand them a bit better. …

Should scholarly publishing be more like Wikipedia?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Not a day passes without someone suggesting a way to reduce the inefficiency of the scholarly publication cycle. There is an interesting article in Scholarly Kitchen by Tim Vines, about Michael Eisen, the new Editor-in-Chief of eLife, suggesting ideas for the …

The Innocence of Wikipedians

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Perhaps it is the innocence of Jimmy Whale,  Wikipedia’s founder, or perhaps it is an innocence shared by all the Wikipedia editors. Either way, Wikipedia is surrounded by a sweet optimism that is at odds with the reality of the actual …

Will Wikipedia ever get their facts right?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Editing Wikipedia appears to some (including me) to be an endless road – it goes on and on, and is never concluded. And that doesn’t mean it gets better – even when highly experienced Wikipedia editors are on the case. Here …

Histropedia – a new way to visualize history?

Reading Time: 3 minutesHistropedia is a site that enables you to create timelines from Wikipedia entries.  According to the two founders of Histropedia (a very klunky name, which makes me think of histrionics), it is “a new type of website that will transform the …

Brockhaus dies, and Wikipedia lives

Reading Time: 3 minutes(This post first appeared at www.consultmu.co.uk in June 2013)

Bertelsmann’s announcement of the closure of Brockhaus encyclopedias (June 2013) is indeed the end of an era. The Brockhaus encyclopedia style was fundamentally different to that of Britannica. While of similar size, …

Page 1 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén